Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Elio

Image source: IMDb. (2025). [Steve Bloom, Brad Garrett, Elio, Shirley Henderson, Harley Jessup, Zoe Saldaña, Anna Wolitzky, Yonas Kibreab, Remy Edgerly, Mary Alice Drumm, Rob Simonsen, Adrian Molina, Jameela Jamil, Madeline Sharafian, and Domee Shi in Elio (2025)]. Retrieved 16 July, 2025, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4900148/mediaviewer/rm1176538626/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk.

Two years ago, Elemental became the first original Disney-Pixar movie to come to theaters after the COVID-19 pandemic. The second movie is recently revealed as Elio.

Pixar movies have touched on monsters, robots, personified emotions, etc. Hence, it is no surprise they center on aliens here. Elio uses aliens to address the universal question "are we alone?" If taken literally, Christians (especially children and immature believers) can have a problem with the substitution of aliens for Jesus Christ. However, the film can also be an allegory illustrating what's beyond this earthly life. 

As with many Pixar movies, Elio has well-developed characters and a solid three-act structure. The titular protagonist, a preteen boy, faces the universal internal conflict of loneliness. Because of his loneliness, Elio (Yonas Kibreab) desires to be abducted by aliens-and eventually gets his wish. Elio has employed the hero's journey structure previously seen in Up and Inside Out

Like Elio, many of us long for something beyond this earthly life (though, of course, it probably doesn't involve aliens). From a Christian viewpoint, the alien world serves as an allegory for the existence of Heaven (of course, except for the conflicts in the alien world). 

Through the alien world, Elio takes on new concepts never addressed by Pixar before. One such concept is cloning; Elio sends his replacement clone back to his Aunt Olga (Zoe Saldaña) on Earth. Thankfully, such cloning does not turn out well in the end.

One critique I have for the story, though, is that the action drags on during the climax. There have also been critiques that, as with many recent animated features, the concept lacks originality. Regarding Elio's loneliness, I get it, but the film explores the theme freshly (loneliness leading to interest in space). 

Regarding the character designs, the "bean mouth" can be another point of criticism. While I understand how repetitive it's gotten in modern animation, I do not mind it much. Besides, not all the characters have "bean mouths"-think the alien Glordon (Remy Edgerly). I find Glordon (and his father outside his battle suit) the cutest character in the film because of his eyeless, caterpillar-like look. 

Alongside Glordon's looks, it has been enjoyable watching him befriend Elio, ailing his loneliness. Elio even sacrifices himself to save Glordon once, an illustration of Jesus' sacrificial love for us. There's also a cute scene involving Glordon and his father towards the end of the picture. 

The visuals, as always in Pixars' films, are stunning with rich textured animation and an inviting pastel color palette. Of course, there is also a well-composed score and believable vocal performances.

In an age mostly dominated by animated sequels and live-action remakes, it is not surprising Elio has not performed as well as the box office as How to Train Your Dragon and Lilo and Stitch. Hence, I encourage everyone, especially families and animation fans, to catch Elio at theaters while they can.  

SCORE: Great (9/10)

AGE RATING: 6+

Have you seen Elio? What do you think about it?

Thursday, July 10, 2025

How to Train Your Dragon (2025 Live-Action)

Image source: IMDb. (2025). [Mason Thames in How to Train Your Dragon (2025)]. Retrieved 9 July, 2025, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt26743210/mediaviewer/rm2901707266/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk.

For many years, only Disney has been turning their animated films into live-action remakes. Dreamworks recently joined in with How to Train Your Dragon

Unlike Disney's remakes, How to Train Your Dragon adapts from a CGI-animated film. This would make its visuals stand out less from those of the 2010 predecessor (which I'm unsure I've ever seen). One notable feature in the remake (that is so prevalent in live-action) is the drab lighting. I know they want to be realistic (and I could see just fine in the theater), but the visuals could still be better. 

Of the dragons, Toothless was the most cartoonish in appearance. He looked similar to his animated counterpart, putting How to Train Your Dragon in the same territory as the recent batch of Sonic films. 

I have not seen the original (at least, not recently), but I heard that How to Train Your Dragon was almost identical to the animation (even more so than Disney's remakes). Almost all the scenes, including Hiccup (Mason Thames) touching Toothless and his ride with Astrid (Nico Parker), have been copied from those I recognize from the animated version. 

Such an approach would imply the original film had no issues to fix (Disney's remakes attempted to fix socially perceived issues, which caused lots of backlash). Yet, it also gives the remake little reason to exist. To remake an already thoroughly developed animated film would imply animation as inferior. 

It is also notable that How to Train Your Dragon became the first CGI-animated film to get the live-action treatment. CGI 3D animation itself brought the medium a long way from being a "kiddie thing" since the release of Toy Story in 1995. According to Noel Brown in The Hollywood Family Film: A History, from Shirley Temple to Harry Potter, 3D animation allowed moviegoers to expect the same thrills as they would from live-action; it no longer looked merely "cartoonish." 

Enough with the debate. How to Train Your Dragon showed me why the franchise became beloved. Hiccup had a character arc from being an outcast afraid of dragons to befriending them. The film also had a three-act structure prevalent in many beloved on-screen stories. 

The performances and costumes were also well-done. Mason Thames as Hiccup gave off a teenage boy vibe. Nico Parker, who previously played Millie in 2019's Dumbo, also shined as Astrid. I also liked her braids. The costumes, overall, gave off the Scandinavian viking vibe I was expecting. 

One more element to praise in How to Train Your Dragon was the score. It was grand and moving, though it struck me as more Celtic than Nordic (maybe because I'm Irish). 

Worldview wise, How to Train Your Dragon could be seen as a gnostic allegory with the dragons representing the devil, hence the bond with humans signaling sympathy for Satan. Yet, one can also read the film as a story about restoring human-animal harmony. 

Overall, How to Train Your Dragon is far from my favorite film, but fans wanting to introduce the franchise to their children or those who have yet to see the original might want to check it out. 

SCORE: Alright (7/10)

AGE RATING: 9+

Have you seen How to Train Your Dragon? What do you think about it?

Tuesday, July 1, 2025

The Snow Queen (1957 Animated)

IMDb. (n.d.). [Sandra Dee, Louise Arthur, Paul Frees, Tommy Kirk, and Patty McCormack in The Snow Queen (1957)]. Retrieved 1 July, 2025, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050987/mediaviewer/rm640804353/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk.

Long before Disney's Frozen hit American theaters, a hand-drawn adaptation of The Snow Queen released in Russia, later to travel overseas. 

The 1957 film will appeal to fans of classic hand-drawn fairy tales such as Disney's Pinocchio and Peter Pan. There is even a Jiminy Cricket-like character, Ole Lukoje (Vladimir Gribkov), who narrates at multiple points throughout the story. Plus, unlike Frozen, The Snow Queen is faithful to Hans Christian Andersen's literary tale. If you've read it, you should be able to follow the film well. 

As a faithful adaptation, The Snow Queen is more Christian than Frozen. While both feature self-sacrificing female leads, the Snow Queen (Mariya Babanova) clearly represents Satan here. Babanova's voice acting succeeds at bringing out her wickedness, which has no motives other than to destroy. 

Unlike Disney's early classics, though, The Snow Queen suffers from a few things. First, the live action opening scene took a bit long to conclude. Instead of focusing on the Christmas presents of multiple children, it could have focused on the one girl who unwrapped "The Snow Queen" and go directly from there. Second, the lighting is surprisingly poor for an animated movie, enough to make me grow drowsy. I don't know if this film has ever been restored, but regardless, The Snow Queen can use one. 

Of course, there are more things I appreciate about The Snow Queen, especially the art style. It has Disney's cartoony realism, but at the same time, it is distinct. For example, the eyes of Gerda (Yanina Zheymo) and Kay (Anna Komolova) are smaller with no white shading. They also appear as if they came out of a European folk painting. The red and white village, too, was charming to look at. 

There are a few songs, including an opening one that plays during the opening credits. Their holiday-inspired tone was memorable, but regarding the lyrics, I only remember the "spring" reference in the opening song. Of course, the songs are not in Broadway-style; they are incidental. 

Fans of hand-drawn animation or the original Hans Christian Andersen tale will appreciate this faithful take, especially during the holiday season. Otherwise, there is little I can recommend. 

SCORE: Okay (6.5/10)

STREAMING SERVICES: Tubi, YouTube

Have you seen The Snow Queen? What do you think about it?

Elio

Image source: IMDb. (2025). [Steve Bloom, Brad Garrett, Elio, Shirley Henderson, Harley Jessup, Zoe Saldaña, Anna Wolitzky, Yonas Kibreab, R...